Ο ρωσικός στρατός θα απαντήσει στην περίπτωση που οι αμερικανικές δυνάμεις χτυπήσουν τη Συρία και ειδικότερα την πρωτεύουσα Δαμασκό, σύμφωνα με όσα μεταδίδουν τα ρωσικά πρακτορεία RIA και Tass.
Όπως δήλωσε ο αρχηγός των ρωσικών ενόπλων δυνάμεων, Valery Gerasimov, η Ρωσία έχει αξιόπιστες πληροφορίες που αναφέρουν ότι σχεδιάζεται προβοκάτσια με δήθεν κυβερνητική επίθεση με χημικά κατά άμαχου πληθυσμού.
Συνέχισε λέγοντας ότι οι ΗΠΑ θα χρησιμοποιήσουν αυτή την επίθεση για να κατηγορήσουν τις κυβερνητικές δυνάμεις της Συρίας ότι κάνουν χρήση χημικών όπλων. Πρόσθεσε ότι οι ΗΠΑ στη συνέχεια σχεδιάζουν να χτυπήσουν με πυραύλους περιοχές της Δαμασκού που βρίσκονται υπό τον έλεγχο της κυβέρνησης.
«Σε πολλές περιοχές της ανατολικής Γούτα, συγκεντρώθηκε πλήθος με γυναίκες, παιδιά και ηλικιωμένους, οι οποίοι μεταφέρθηκαν από άλλα μέρη. Το πλήθος αυτό θα είναι τα θύματα της επίθεσης με χημικά», τόνισε ο Gerasimov, σύμφωνα πάντα με το RIA.
Ο ίδιος προειδοποίησε ότι η Ρωσία θα απαντήσει στην περίπτωση που τα χτυπήματα των αμερικανικών δυνάμεων απειλήσουν ρωσικά στρατεύματα.
Υπενθυμίζεται ότι οι ΗΠΑ έχουν προειδοποιήσει πως αν δεν λάβει κάποια απόφαση το συμβούλιο Ασφαλείας του ΟΗΕ για όσα συμβαίνουν στη Γούτα, τότε θα αναλάβουν δράση.
A) There is a fondamental contradiction in U.S. involvemnt in Syria. How can the U.S. implemnt its policy in Syria, without Russia?
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήB) There is a second, " circumstancial" , contradiction in U.S. today involvemnt in Syria, which might cause a long term damage for the U.S. presence in the region :
It is not reasonable to protect the anti-Assad and pro-ISIS coalition in the suburbs of Damascus (if not simply ISIS in Damascus), even contrary to the Russian reactions on the ground and in the air,
without first protecting the Kurdish forces and people in the North of Syria, who fought ISIS for the U.S., and are suffering now an ethnic cleansing by Tourkish forces with the willing consent of Russia and the unwilling neutralisation of U.S.
C) I think that the replacemnt of Russia in the North, by a decisive and strong protection of the Kurds, against Turkey, will cover the gup of power impotency of the U.S. in N. Syria, abd increase its negotiation possibilities with Russia, with the scope of a common agreement for Syria.
D) The constant anti-productive factor for U.S. in Syria, other factors excluded, is not Russia, but Turkey's insistence in seeing only terrorists and not the legitimate national struggle of Kurnds, in its South (N. Syria).
E) Without Turkey's reaction against Kurds at Afrin, N.Syria, today, the U.S. government would already be discussing with Rossians the whole final outcome of the war situation in Syria, the creation of a Kurdish state included, under a commonly forced "cessez le feu" upon all acive opponents, ISIS included.
F) The last thing the world needs (Israel's absolute safety unfortunetely excluded), is a conflict between U.S., France and United Kingdom on the one hand, and Russia, Syria and Iran on the other.
G) Turkey, if victorious against Kurds in N.Syria, will tend to continue war in order to expand itself aver Assad's Syria, with the consent of U.S. and against Russia's will and stronger power. This will force a U.S. further intervention, even if it is likely to escalate to a nuclear war.
H) Turkey, if restrained in N. Syria by U.S., will tend to stay outside any conflict there, and - being not a democracy, nor a state respectful of international law, but a stubborn candidate for becoming by itself a great world power - will surely make war in Balcans, calling U.S. and NATO protection against Russia, as it seems unlikely that Russia will let Balcans become a hostile islamic empire. This again will escalate to further conflict potential, which does not seem being outside some U.S. plans (a fake " Macedonia" is one of them), but which undoubtly increase the presence of Russian nationalists in the Balcans (a fake " Macedonia" is one of their plans, too).
I) All reasonable process, tending to peace in the region, depends on the right and fair solution of the Kurdish national problem, which problem is mainly Turkey itself, by its constant ethnic cleansing activities and genocide periods.
IA) There is not such a thing, as a constant never ending war situation, which some wished for Syria (and who turned Syria into a nightmare reality of ISIS etc.). A constant war is not possilbe, it escalates and bursts suddenly, naturally, as a human fault suffices for it to happen.
IB) An impartial and fair observer would tend to believe that Russia would be happy to negotiate with the U.S. government, the creation of a pro-U.S. Kurdish state, against the non replacement of the Assad regime in Syria. This would easily establish peace in all region and simply force Turkey to stay at its normal size.
IC) The rest of the world power conflicts, may very well be looked upon as soon as this clear and present danger to the world peace in middle East, which lasts for already 8 years, calms down.
Ποιος τα λεει ολα αυτα ωρε Σωκρατες;
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήΕσυ;
Γιατι τα πραγματα ειναι καπως διαφορετικα.
Let's translate your intervention " Elias Cavadas":
Διαγραφή" Who on earth is saying all these things, Socrates?
You?
Because things are a somehow different".
_ So, you are you theatening me!
If you think things are different, why don't you say, in what they are different?
(I will not translate again).
Ναι ναι τώρα ξεκινάνε πόλεμο πυρηνικό
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφή